INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHANGES IN EDUCATION
Review
Aug 09, 2026 119 55

Do You See What I Am Saying? Changing Education: Recognizing the Role of Visual Perception in Reading Development

Ellen Modlin 1 *
1 Department of Occupational Therapy, Florida International University, USA* Corresponding Author
International Journal of Changes in Education, 3(3), 2026, 287-294, https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52024909
Online publication date: May 30, 2025
Publication date: Aug 09, 2026
Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Researchers, educators, and parents have struggled to understand why some learn to read with ease while others face hardship. This review chronicles early theories of reading development, presents emerging research that explores additional factors that are believed to influence reading skill, and then suggests an agenda for future research to inform instructional methods in reading education. A thorough search of the literature was conducted to present perspectives on reading development that highlight critical yet overlooked factors that contribute to reading mastery. The research was compiled, reviewed, and presented in this article to elucidate the findings. Emerging research has identified several areas in which visual perception is essential to reading skills development. Researchers found that visual memory predicts word recognition. Inter-letter spacing and increased spacing between words have been found to improve reading speed. Visual attention is associated with reading accuracy. It is incumbent upon researchers and educators to better understand all the components of reading, so we may help students achieve their reading outcomes. Arguably, the conceptualization of reading assessment and reading intervention should be broadened by considering additional component skills that may impede reading success. Research highlights the importance of visual perception in recognizing letters and words. However, the role of visual perception in reading development has been mostly overlooked in language-based educational curricula. Visual perception should be explored further through research and practice to support students who struggle with reading and do not respond to traditional language-based reading instruction.

KEYWORDS

reading education visual perception schools reading deficits

CITATION (APA)

Modlin, E. (2026). Do You See What I Am Saying? Changing Education: Recognizing the Role of Visual Perception in Reading Development. International Journal of Changes in Education, 3(3), 287-294. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52024909
Harvard
Modlin, E. (2026). Do You See What I Am Saying? Changing Education: Recognizing the Role of Visual Perception in Reading Development. International Journal of Changes in Education, 3(3), pp. 287-294. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52024909
Vancouver
Modlin E. Do You See What I Am Saying? Changing Education: Recognizing the Role of Visual Perception in Reading Development. International Journal of Changes in Education. 2026;3(3):287-94. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52024909
AMA
Modlin E. Do You See What I Am Saying? Changing Education: Recognizing the Role of Visual Perception in Reading Development. International Journal of Changes in Education. 2026;3(3), 287-294. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52024909
Chicago
Modlin, Ellen. "Do You See What I Am Saying? Changing Education: Recognizing the Role of Visual Perception in Reading Development". International Journal of Changes in Education 2026 3 no. 3 (2026): 287-294. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52024909
MLA
Modlin, Ellen "Do You See What I Am Saying? Changing Education: Recognizing the Role of Visual Perception in Reading Development". International Journal of Changes in Education, vol. 3, no. 3, 2026, pp. 287-294. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52024909

REFERENCES

  1. Pearson, P. D. (2000). Chapter IV: Reading in the twentieth century. Teachers College Record, 102(8), 152–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810010200804
  2. Handel, D. V., & Hanushek, E. A. (2023). US school finance: Resources and outcomes. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (7, pp. 143–226). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesedu.2023.03.003
  3. Compton-Lilly, C., Spence, L. K., Thomas, P. L., & Decker,S. L. (2023). Stories grounded in decades of research: What we truly know about the teaching of reading. The Reading Teacher, 77(3), 392–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2258
  4. National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2022). National assessment of reading progress. Retrieved from: https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading/?grade=4
  5. Katz, M. S. (1976). A history of compulsory education laws. Fastback series, No. 75. Bicentennial series. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED119389.pdf
  6. Rock, I., & Palmer, S. (1990). The legacy of Gestalt psychology. Scientific American, 263(6), 84–91. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24997014
  7. Morris, J. M. (1959). Teaching children to read—II The relative effectiveness of different methods of teaching reading. Educational Research, 1(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188590010205
  8. Bugelski, B. R. (1970). Words and things and images. American Psychologist, 25(12), 1000–1012. https://doi.org/10.1037/ h0030150
  9. Roark, C. L., Lescht, E., Hampton Wray, A., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2023). Auditory and visual category learning in children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 59(5), 963–975. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001525
  10. Duke, N. K., Ward, A. E., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1993
  11. Pearson, P. D., Palincsar, A., Biancarosa, G., & Berman, A. I. (2020). Reaping the rewards of the reading for understanding initiative. USA: National Academy of Education. https://doi.org/10.31094/2020/2
  12. Snowling, M. J. (1995). Phonological processing and developmental dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 18(2). 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1995.tb00079.x
  13. Schatschneider, C., Santangelo, D., White, C. M., Vasquez, C. E., & Friedmann, E. D. (2023). Design and methodology in the science of reading. The Reading League Journal, 4(1), 23–31.
  14. Shanahan, T. (2020). What constitutes a science of reading instruction? Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S235–S247. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.349
  15. Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J. M. (2021). Identifying and teaching students with significant reading problems. American Educator, 44(4), 4.
  16. Petscher, Y., Cabell, S. Q., Catts, H. W., Compton, D. L., Foorman, B. R., & Hart, S. A. (2020). How the science of reading informs 21st-century education. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S267–S282. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.352
  17. May, H., Blakeney, A., Shrestha, P., Mazal, M., & Kennedy, N. (2024). Long-term impacts of reading recovery through 3rd and 4th grade: A regression discontinuity study. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 17(3), 433–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2023.2209092
  18. Zoccolotti, P. (2022). Success is not the entire story for a scientific theory: The case of the phonological deficit theory of dyslexia. Brain Sciences, 12(4), 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12040425
  19. Mundy, I. R., & Hannant, P. (2020). Exploring the phonological profiles of children with reading difficulties: A multiple case study. Dyslexia, 26(4), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1667
  20. Shaywitz, S. E., Morris, R., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2008). The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093633
  21. Iversen, S., & Tunmer, W. E. (1993). Phonological processing skills and the reading recovery program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.1.112
  22. Véronique, I., Ke, W., Tabitha, T., Jijun, Z., Alison, F., Julie, J., . . . , & Stephanie, P. (2023). Report on the condition of education 2023 (NCES 2023-144). U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED630121
  23. Polirstok, S., & Hogan, J. A. (2024). Implementation of RtI as a part of multi-tiered systems of support: What teachers, administrators, and teacher educators need to know. Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.14305/jn.19440413.2024.16.2.05
  24. Sharp, K., Sanders, K., Noltemeyer, A., Hoffman, J., & Boone, W. J. (2015). The relationship between RTI implementation and reading achievement: A school-level analysis. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 60(2), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2015.1063038
  25. Joel, M., Bill, H., Cristobal, D. B., Tom, S., Xiaole, W., & Sidney, W. F. (2017). The condition of education 2017(NCES 2017-144). U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED574257
  26. Ekstrand, C., Neudorf, J., Kress, S., & Borowsky, R. (2020). Structural connectivity predicts functional activation during lexical and sublexical reading. NeuroImage, 218, 117008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117008
  27. White, A. L., Kay, K. N., Tang, K. A., & Yeatman, J. D. (2023). Engaging in word recognition elicits highly specific modulations in visual cortex. Current Biology, 33(7), 1308–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.02.042
  28. Alduais, A., Alarifi, H. S., & Alfadda, H. (2024). Neuropsychological diagnosis and assessment of Alexia: A mixed-methods study. Brain Sciences, 14(7), 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14070636
  29. Sabsevitz, D. S., Middlebrooks, E. H., Tatum, W., Grewal, S. S., Wharen, R., & Ritaccio, A. L. (2020). Examining the function of the visual word form area with stereo EEG electrical stimulation: A case report of pure alexia. Cortex, 129, 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.012
  30. International Association of Dyslexia. (2024). Definition of dyslexia. Retrieved from: https://dyslexiaida.org/definition-of-dyslexia
  31. Godfrey, V. (2024). “Whats Unexpected?” Interventionist explanations of dyslexia. Journal of Literacy Research, 56(3), 242–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X241269922
  32. Wagner, R. K., & Lonigan, C. J. (2022). Early identification of children with dyslexia: Variables differentially predict poor reading versus unexpected poor reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.480
  33. Coskun, K. (2024). Which variables better predict phonemic awareness of first grade primary school students? Psychological Reports. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241291037
  34. Day, S. L., Atilgan, N., Giroux, A. E., & Sawyer, B. D. (2024). The influence of format readability on children’s reading speed and comprehension. Education Sciences, 14(8), 854. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080854
  35. Katzir, T., Hershko, S., & Halamish, V. (2013). The effect of font size on reading comprehension on second and fifth grade children: Bigger is not always better. PLoS One, 8(9), e74061. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074061
  36. Franceschini, S., Gori, S., Ruffino, M., Pedrolli, K., & Facoetti, A. (2012). A causal link between visual spatial attention and reading acquisition. Current Biology, 22(9), 814–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.013
  37. Perea, M., Panadero, V., Moret-Tatay, C., & Gómez, P. (2012). The effects of inter-letter spacing in visual-word recognition: Evidence with young normal readers and developmental dyslexics. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.04.001
  38. Schneps, M. H., Thomson, J. M., Sonnert, G., Pomplun, M., Chen, C., & Heffner-Wong, A. (2013). Shorter lines facilitate reading in those who struggle. PLoS One, 8(8), e71161. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071161
  39. Zorzi, M., Barbiero, C., Facoetti, A., Lonciari, I., Carrozzi, M., & Montico, M. (2012). Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(28), 11455–11459. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205566109
  40. Christofalos, A. L., Arco, N. M., Laks, M., & Sheridan, H. (2024). The impact of interword spacing on inference processing during text reading: Evidence from eye movements. Discourse Processes, 62(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2024.2413811
  41. Roemmich, J. (2023). Manipulating the distance of inter-letter and inter-word spacing to improve reading accuracy and speed in the dyslexic student. Master Thesis, University of Minnesota.
  42. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
  43. Stein, J. (2022). The visual basis of reading and reading difficulties. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, 1004027. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1004027
  44. Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356
  45. Ehri, L. C. (2017). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351236904-5
  46. Warmington, M., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phoneme awareness, visual-verbal paired-associate learning, and rapid automatized naming as predictors of individual differences in reading ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.534832
  47. Li, S., Fan, T., & Zhao, J. (2023). The prediction of syllable awareness, character reading ability, and rapid automatized naming on phoneme awareness: Evidence from a longitudinal cross-lag model. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d9cns
  48. Bar, Kochva, I., & Nevo, E. (2019). The relations of early phonological awareness, rapid naming and speed of processing with the development of spelling and reading: A longitudinal examination. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12242
  49. Sigmund, J. L., Mehlhase, H., Schulte-Körne, G., & Moll, K. (2024). Early cognitive predictors of spelling and reading in German-speaking children. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1378313. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1378313
  50. Horowitz-Kraus, T., Rosch, K., Fotang, J., Mostofsky, S. H., Schlaggar, B. L., Pekar, J., . . . , & Tara, N. (2023). Fluent contextual reading is associated with greater synchronization of the visual and auditory networks, fluent reading and better speed of processing in children with dyslexia. Cortex, 168, 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2023.07.007
  51. Modlin, E. (2024). Exploring performance skills in the occupation of learning to read. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 1–16. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2024.2351481
  52. Martin, N. A. (2017). Test of visual perceptual skills. USA: Academic Therapy Publications.
  53. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2014). Kaufman test of educational achievement, third edition. USA: NCS Pearson.
  54. Pickering, H. E., Peters, J. L., & Crewther, S. G. (2023). A role for visual memory in vocabulary development: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review, 33(4), 803–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-022-09561-4
  55. Yoo, J. H., & Saunders, K. J. (2014). The discrimination of printed words by prereading children. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 15(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2014.11434509
  56. Tsai, H. J., Chen, J. K., & Wang, L. C. (2024). The impact of early picture book interaction experience on Chinese character reading of children with dyslexia: The perspective of visual temporal processing. Cognitive Development, 71, 101477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101477
  57. Valdois, S., Roulin, J. L., & Bosse, M. L. (2019). Visual attention modulates reading acquisition. Vision Research, 165, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.10.011

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.