INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHANGES IN EDUCATION
Research Article
Nov 24, 2025 1 0

Influence of Culture on Chinese University Students' Interaction with Feedback

Vladislav Ilin 1 * ,
Jiaming Ke 2,
Sunantana Nuanla-Or 3
1 Digital Media, Birmingham City University, UK2 Digital Media, Wuhan Textile University, China3 Department of Landscape Architecture, Wuhan Textile University, China* Corresponding Author
International Journal of Changes in Education, 2(4), 2025, 279-289, https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022828
Publication date: Nov 24, 2025
Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Feedback is a powerful learning tool; however, cultural elements may inhibit its effectiveness. In China, the teacher-student dynamics are different than in the West and the methodologies purported by Western scholars may not be effective. This paper identifies
cultural elements of Mianzi and Guanxi that influence social relationships in Chinese academic environments. The research explores the needs and perspectives on feedback practices of twenty-five senior undergraduate students at a Chinese University via semi-structured interviews. The results offer insight into best feedback practices when working with Chinese students. The key takeaway is that most Western effective feedback guidelines translate into the Chinese classroom; however, power dynamics inherent in Confucianist society inhibit students from engaging with teachers. It is also important to note that peer feedback may not be as effective because students may be reluctant to make a peer lose face or may not see peers as having valid opinions. Understanding key cultural concepts can facilitate communication between teachers and students, improving feedback effectiveness.

KEYWORDS

feedback Chinese culture university higher education learning

CITATION (APA)

Ilin, V., Ke, J., & Nuanla-Or, S. (2025). Influence of Culture on Chinese University Students' Interaction with Feedback. International Journal of Changes in Education, 2(4), 279-289. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022828
Harvard
Ilin, V., Ke, J., and Nuanla-Or, S. (2025). Influence of Culture on Chinese University Students' Interaction with Feedback. International Journal of Changes in Education, 2(4), pp. 279-289. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022828
Vancouver
Ilin V, Ke J, Nuanla-Or S. Influence of Culture on Chinese University Students' Interaction with Feedback. International Journal of Changes in Education. 2025;2(4):279-89. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022828
AMA
Ilin V, Ke J, Nuanla-Or S. Influence of Culture on Chinese University Students' Interaction with Feedback. International Journal of Changes in Education. 2025;2(4), 279-289. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022828
Chicago
Ilin, Vladislav, Jiaming Ke, and Sunantana Nuanla-Or. "Influence of Culture on Chinese University Students' Interaction with Feedback". International Journal of Changes in Education 2025 2 no. 4 (2025): 279-289. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022828
MLA
Ilin, Vladislav et al. "Influence of Culture on Chinese University Students' Interaction with Feedback". International Journal of Changes in Education, vol. 2, no. 4, 2025, pp. 279-289. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022828

REFERENCES

  1. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
  2. Zhan, Y. (2019). Conventional or sustainable? Chinese university students’ thinking about feedback used in their English lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 973–986. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1557105
  3. Biggs, J., Tang, C., & Kennedy, G. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university (5th ed.). UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
  4. Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449
  5. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 metaanalyses relating to achievement. UK: Routledge.
  6. Blair, A., & McGinty, S. (2013). Feedback-dialogues: Exploring the student perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(4), 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.649244
  7. O’Donovan, B. M., den Outer, B., Price, M., & Lloyd, A. (2021). What makes good feedback good? Studies in Higher Education, 46(2), 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1630812
  8. Shields, S. (2015). ‘My work is bleeding’: Exploring students’ emotional responses to first-year assignment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(6), 614–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1052786
  9. Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007
  10. Burke, D., & Pieterick, J. (2010). Giving students effective written feedback. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
  11. Starkey, L. (2012). Teaching and learning in the digital age. UK: Routledge.
  12. Williams, J., Kane, D., Sagu, S., & Smith, E. (2008). Exploring the national student survey: Assessment and feedback issues. The Higher Education Academy, Centre for Research into Quality. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?doi=c38acc136c17c130a64845c31cef1d2c42385491
  13. Department of Education and Training (2018). Feedback for learning: Closing the assessment loop. Australian Government. https://researchmgt.monash.edu/ws/portalfiles/portal/273765412/273765375_oa.pdf
  14. Nicol,D. (2010). Frommonologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
  15. Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (2009). Processing tutor feedback: A consideration of qualitative differences in learning outcomes for high achieving and non-high achieving students. In European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, 32, 262–287.
  16. Brown, J. (2007). Feedback: The student perspective. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 12(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596740601155363
  17. Jarvis, P., Holford, J., & Griffin, C. (Eds.). (2003). The theory and practice of learning. UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203465653
  18. Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). UK: Pearson Education.
  19. Clark, K. R. (2018). Learning theories: Constructivism. Radiologic Technology, 90(2), 180–182.
  20. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. USA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
  21. Ilin, V. (2022). The role of user preferences in engagement with online learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211035514
  22. Mngo, Z. (2023). A case for caution: Twenty-one years of Bologna and ramifications for the US higher education. Journal of Education, 203(3), 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211032583
  23. O’Neill, G., & McMahon, T. (2005). Student-centred learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers? In G. O’Neill, S. Moore, & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching (pp. 27–36). AISHE.
  24. Hoidn, S., & Klemenčič, M. (Eds.). (2020). The Routledge international handbook of student-centered learning and teaching in higher education (1st ed.). UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429259371
  25. Bahtilla, M., & Xu, H. (2021). The influence of Confucius’s educational thoughts on China’s educational system. Open Access Library Journal, 8, e7370. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107370
  26. Zhu, N., Yang, Z., Cai, S., & Sun, H. (2022). Understanding the differences between Chinese and Western business practices: Insights into Confucian philosophy. European Journal of International Management, 17(2–3), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2022.120701
  27. Koczkás, S. (2023). Confucianism: Ancient ideology or driving force of the future? A scoping review on the effect of Confucian culture on innovation. Society and Economy, 45(4), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2023.00021
  28. Mukhopadhyay, B. R., & Mukhopadhyay, B. K. (2020). ‘Guanxi’: The Chinese social capital. Tripura Times, Editorial.
  29. Ng, R. M.-C. (2009). College and character: What did Confucius teach us about the importance of integrating ethics, character, learning, and education? Journal of College and Character, 10(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-1639.1045
  30. Hu, W., & Grove, C. L. (1999). Encountering the Chinese: A guide for Americans. USA: Intercultural Press.
  31. Liu, L., & Gong, L. (2022). “Huíguī běntǐ” de gāoxiào xuéshù píngjià – Jīyú Shēnhuà xīn shídài jiàoyù píngjià gǎigé zǒngtǐ fāng'àn de sīkǎo [Returning to the ontology of academic evaluation in colleges and universities – Reflections based on the Overall Plan for Deepening the Reform of Education Evaluation in the New Era]. Theory and Practice of Education, 42(36), 3–7.
  32. Tan, C. (2015). Teacher-directed and learner-engaged: Exploring a Confucian conception of education. Ethics and Education, 10(3), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2015.1101229
  33. Jiang, X., & Zeng, L. (2011). Dàxué yīngyǔ jiàoshī shūmiàn fǎnkuì zuòyè xíngwéi de xiàolǜ – Xīn shìjiǎo xià de shízhèng yánjiū [The efficiency of college English teachers’ written feedback on homework behavior: An empirical study from a new perspective]. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 32(4), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.16482/j.sdwy37-1026.2011.04.018
  34. Niu, K. (2015). Dàxuéshēng xuéxí guòchéng píngjià chūtān [A preliminary exploration of the evaluation of college students’ learning process]. Higher Education Development and Evaluation, 4, 6–13.
  35. Dan, W. (2008). Gāoshī běnkē jiàoyùxué jiàoxué “guòchéng píngjià” de chángshì [Attempting process evaluation in undergraduate education teaching in normal colleges]. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, (12), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.19877/j.cnki.kcjcjf.2008.12.018
  36. Yang, Z. (2021). Dàxuéshēng kèchéng xuéxí guòchéngxìng píngjià de xiànzhuàng, wèntí yǔ duìcè [The current situation, problems, and strategies of formative assessment in university course learning]. Education and Examinations, (04), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.16391/j.cnki.jyks.2021.04.015
  37. Song, N., Xiao, L., & Luo, S. (2018). Pòjiě “wǔ wéi” wánjí, gòujiàn wǒgu´o xīn shídài jiàoyù píngjià guān – Jīyú xuéshēng fāzhǎn de shìjiǎo [Cracking the “five onlys” dilemmas and constructing a new era educational evaluation view in China – Based on the perspective of student development]. Education and Teaching Research, 32(11), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.13627/j.cnki.cdjy.2018.11.002
  38. Marie, J. (2016). Student views on the value of feedback. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(6), 207–213.
  39. Qiu, J. (2021). Xīn shídài jiàoyù píngjià gǎigé bèijǐng xià xuéshēng píngjià tǐxì de sīkǎo [Reflections on the student evaluation system under the background of educational evaluation reform in the new era]. Survey of Education, 10(11), 41–44. https://doi.org/10.16070/j.cnki.cn45-1388/g4s.2021.11.014
  40. Li, Z. (2022). Xīn shídài jiàoyù píngjià gǎigé bèijǐng xià gāoxiào luòshí lì dé shù rén de lùjìng yánjiū [Research on the path of implementing the fundamental task of fostering morality and cultivating talents in universities under the background of the new era of education evaluation reform]. Journal of Changchun Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 23(01), 104–107.
  41. Tan, H., & Wang, Y. (2021). Guànchè luòshí “shēnhuà xīn shídài jiàoyù píngjià gǎigé zǒngtǐ fāng’àn” de jǐ gè guānjiàn wèntí [Several key issues in implementing the “overall plan for deepening the reform of education evaluation in the new era”]. Journal of China Examinations, 8, 14–20.
  42. Zhou, H. (2020). Zhǐdǎo shēnhuà xīn shídài jiàoyù píngjià gǎigé de gānglǐng xìng wénjiàn – Shēnhuà xīn shídài jiàoyù píngjià gǎigé zǒngtǐ fāng'àn jiědú [Interpretation of the guiding document for deepening the reform of education evaluation in the new era—Interpretation of the Overall Plan for Deepening the Reform of Education Evaluation in the New Era]. Red Flag Manuscript, 22, 8–12.
  43. Cheng, T., Zhang, M., Qin, Y., Sui, Y., Zhou, H., & Zheng, S. (2021). Shēnhuà xīn shídài jiàoyù píngjià gǎigé de sīkǎo yǔ fāngxiàng [Reflections and directions on deepening the reform of education evaluation in the new era]. China Educational Technology, (07), 1−12.
  44. Zuo, S., & Sun, G. (2022). Zēngzhíxìng píngjià: Cùjìnměi yī gè xuéshēng kě chíxù fāzhǎn [Value-added evaluation: Promoting sustainable development of every student]. Journal of Shanghai Educational Research, 3, 70–75.
  45. Zhu, L., Song, N., Luo, L., & Zou, X. (2020). Xīn shídài jiàoyù píngjià gǎigé de sīkǎo [Thoughts on educational evaluation reform in the new era]. Journal of China Examinations, (9), 15–19.
  46. Liu, X., & Tian, X. (2020). Xīn shídài jīchǔ jiàoyù píngjià gǎigé de lùxiàng zhuǎnbiàn [The direction change of basic education evaluation reform in the new era]. Journal of China Examinations, (08), 16−19. https://doi.org/10.19360/j.cnki.11-303/g4.2020.08.004
  47. Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2021). Student feedback literacy and engagement with feedback: A case study of Chinese undergraduate students. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1648410
  48. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). UK: Pearson Education.
  49. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education (8th ed.). UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
  50. Adeoye-Olatunde, O. A., & Olenik, N. L. (2021). Research and scholarly methods: Semi-structured interviews. Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 4(10), 1358–1367. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1441
  51. Ruslin, Mashuri, S., Rasak, M. S. A., Alhabsyi, F., & Syam, H. (2022). Semi-structured interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 12(1), 22–29.
  52. Stern, M. J., & Powell, R. B. (2024). Identifying relevant research questions: A tentative framework for inquiry in interpretation research. Journal of Interpretation Research, 29(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872241249319
  53. Kadyschuk, L. (2023). Interpretive analysis. In J. M. Okoko, S. Tunison, & K. D. Walker (Eds.), Varieties of qualitative research methods: Selected contextual perspectives (pp. 249–255). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_40
  54. Liu, Z. (2020). Jiàoyù píngjià pò “wǔ wéi” zhòng zài lì “sì xīn” [Educational evaluation focuses on creating the “four news” instead of adhering to the “five onlys”]. Journal of National Academy of Education Administration, (11), 13–15.
  55. Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
  56. Philippakos, Z. A. (2017). Giving feedback: Preparing students for peer review and self-evaluation. The Reading Teacher, 71(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1568

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.