INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHANGES IN EDUCATION
Review
Feb 09, 2026 1 0

Mentimeter Tool for Enhancing Student Engagement and Active Learning: A Literature Review

Muzammal Ahmad Khan 1 *
1 School of Business and Creative Industries, University of the West of Scotland, UK* Corresponding Author
International Journal of Changes in Education, 3(1), 2026, 1-10, https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52023801
Publication date: Feb 09, 2026
Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This review addresses the growing integration of technology in education by examining the role of Mentimeter, a student response system (SRS), in enhancing teaching and learning. The study aims to consolidate existing research to provide insights into Mentimeter’s impact on educational practices, identifying both its advantages and limitations and offering guidance for its effective use in diverse learning environments. A systematic review of 40 peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2023 was conducted using thematic analysis. The studies were selected through extensive searches across six electronic databases, employing predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction and analysis focused on identifying recurring themes and patterns related to the use of Mentimeter in various educational settings. The review reveals that Mentimeter enhances student engagement, encourages collaboration, and boosts participation through its interactive and anonymous response features. It supports active learning and facilitates real-time formative assessment, making it a valuable tool for both in-person and online teaching. However, challenges such as technical issues, costs, and the need for training and ethical guidelines were also identified. The findings suggest that integrating Mentimeter into teaching practices can improve learning experiences by bringing interactivity and engagement. Educators are encouraged to explore innovative applications of the tool while addressing its limitations. Future research should focus on its long-term impact, applications in remote and hybrid learning environments, and comparative evaluations with other SRS.

KEYWORDS

student response system Mentimeter student engagement student satisfaction polling tool real-time feedback

CITATION (APA)

Khan, M. A. (2026). Mentimeter Tool for Enhancing Student Engagement and Active Learning: A Literature Review. International Journal of Changes in Education, 3(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52023801
Harvard
Khan, M. A. (2026). Mentimeter Tool for Enhancing Student Engagement and Active Learning: A Literature Review. International Journal of Changes in Education, 3(1), pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52023801
Vancouver
Khan MA. Mentimeter Tool for Enhancing Student Engagement and Active Learning: A Literature Review. International Journal of Changes in Education. 2026;3(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52023801
AMA
Khan MA. Mentimeter Tool for Enhancing Student Engagement and Active Learning: A Literature Review. International Journal of Changes in Education. 2026;3(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52023801
Chicago
Khan, Muzammal Ahmad. "Mentimeter Tool for Enhancing Student Engagement and Active Learning: A Literature Review". International Journal of Changes in Education 2026 3 no. 1 (2026): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52023801
MLA
Khan, Muzammal Ahmad "Mentimeter Tool for Enhancing Student Engagement and Active Learning: A Literature Review". International Journal of Changes in Education, vol. 3, no. 1, 2026, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52023801

REFERENCES

  1. Bernacki, M. L., Greene, J. A., & Crompton, H. (2020). Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101827. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEDPSYCH.2019.101827
  2. Anggriani, M. D., Haryanto, H., & Atmojo, S. E. (2022). The impact of problem-based learning model assisted by Mentimeter media in science learning on students’ critical thinking and collaboration skills. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.23887/IJEE.V6I2.46837
  3. Pichardo, J. I., López-Medina, E. F., Mancha-Cáceres, O., González-Enríquez, I., Hernández-Melián, A., Blázquez-Rodríguez, M., ..., & Borrás-Gené, O. (2021). Students and teachers using Mentimeter: Technological innovation to face the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and post-pandemic in higher education. Education Sciences, 11(11), 667. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI11110667
  4. Musliha, S., & Purnawarman, P. (2020). Using Mentimeter for eliciting the students’ responses in formative assessment practice. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Technology and Education, 318–325. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201214.255
  5. Mohammadi, M., Khoshneshin, Z., & Mohammadhasani, N. (2022). Gamification with leaderboard: Effect of educational tools based on competition and cooperation in learning and approach motivation of math lesson. Technology of Education Journal, 16(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.22061/TEJ.2021.7996.2606
  6. Rudolph, J. (2018). A brief review of Mentimeter-A student response system. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 1(1), 35–37. https://doi.org/10.37074/JALT.2018.1.1.5
  7. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 13–23.
  8. Post, C., Sarala, R., Gatrell, C., & Prescott, J. E. (2020). Advancing theory with review articles. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 351–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOMS.12549
  9. Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678
  10. Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1471-1842.2009.00848.X
  11. Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or metaanalyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/JRSM.1378
  12. Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Keele University and Durham University Joint Report. https://legacyfileshare.elsevier.com/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf
  13. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  14. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  15. Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
  16. Gonzalez, T., de la Rubia., M. A., Hincz, K. P., Comas-Lopez, M., Subirats, L., Fort, S., & Sacha, G. M. (2020). Influence of COVID-19 confinement on students’ performance in higher education. PLOS ONE, 15(10), e0239490. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239490
  17. Khan, M. A. (2021). COVID-19’s impact on higher education: A rapid review of early reactive literature. Education Sciences, 11(8), 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI11080421
  18. Vallely, K. S. A., & Gibson, P. (2018). Engaging students on their devices with Mentimeter. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.21100/COMPASS.V11I2.843
  19. Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. USA: Harvard University Press.
  20. Madiseh, F. R., Al-Abri, A., & Sobhanifar, H. (2023). Integrating Mentimeter to boost students’ motivation, autonomy, and achievement. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 24(3), 232–251.
  21. Dommett, E. J., Gardner, B., & van Tilburg, W. (2019). Staff and student views of lecture capture: A qualitative study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0153-2
  22. Cavinato, A. G., Hunter, R. A., Ott, L. S., & Robinson, J. K. (2021). Promoting student interaction, engagement, and success in an online environment. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 413(6), 1513–1520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03178-x
  23. Laurillard, D. (2013). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. USA: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203125083
  24. Granberg, C., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2021). A case study of a formative assessment practice and the effects on students’ self-regulated learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955
  25. Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and teacher education: A literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184
  26. Little, C. (2016). Mentimeter smartphone student response system: A class above clickers. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 9(13), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.21100/COMPASS.V9I13.328
  27. Tetep, T., Suherman, A., Dimyati, E., Hermansyah, H., Melati, P., & Darojat, A. (2020). The use of Mentimeter applications in online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic at the MGMP PPKn Garut Regency. Pekemas: Journal of Community Service, 3(2), 51–56.
  28. Jackly, L., & Lestariningsih, F. E. (2022). The use of Mentimeter as a medium for discussion in the EFL classroom: Students’ and teachers’ perspectives. Indonesian Tesol Journal, 4(2), 118–127.
  29. Kuritza, V. C., Cibich, D. P., & Ahmad, K. A. (2020). Interactive presentation digital tool Mentimeter perceived as accessible and beneficial for exam preparation by medical students. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 1(2), 63–67. https:// doi.org/10.25082/AERE.2020.02.002
  30. Mayhew, E., Davies, M., Millmore, A., Thompson, L., & Pena, A. (2020). The impact of audience response platform Mentimeter on the student and staff learning experience. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.25304/RLT.V28.2397
  31. Demirci, C., Duraklı, H., & Güdücü, A. (2021). The use of audience response system in English teaching: The example of mentimeter. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(12), 432–446. https://doi.org/10.46827/EJES.V8I12.4083
  32. Skoyles, A., & Bloxsidge, E. (2017). Have you voted? Teaching OSCOLA with Mentimeter. Legal Information Management, 17(4), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1472669617000457
  33. Bayu, A., & Sari, P. (2021). The impacts of Mentimeter-based activities on EFL students’ engagement in Indonesia. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 24(1), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.24071/LLT.V24I1.3025
  34. Ahshan, R. (2022). Students’ perception and satisfaction on technology-enhanced active student engagement in remote teaching and learning. In 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, 1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766628
  35. Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2020). Using Mentimeter to elicit student responses in the EAP/ESP classroom. RELC Journal, 51(1), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219890350
  36. Gokbulut, B. (2020). The effect of Mentimeter and Kahoot applications on university students’ e-learning. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 12(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.18844/WJET.V12I2.4814
  37. Hill, D. L., & Fielden, K. (2017). Using Mentimeter to promote student engagement and inclusion [Powerpoint Slides]. Pedagogy in Practice Seminar. http://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/3473/
  38. Webb, S. (2022). Can Mentimeter enhance university student participation in taught sessions? International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33422/IJHEP.V3I4.72
  39. Quiroz Canlas, F., Nair, S., & Nirmal Doss, A. (2020). Mentimeter app in computer science courses: Integration model and students’ reception. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3436756.3436757
  40. Jusuf, H., Ibrahim, N., & Suparman, A. (2019). Developing a hybrid learning strategy for students’ engagement in object-oriented programming course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9A), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.13189/UJER.2019.071610
  41. Puspa, A., & Imamyartha, D. (2019). Experiences of social science students through online application of Mentimeter in English milieu. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 243(2019), 012063. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012063
  42. Andriani, A., Dewi, I., & Sagala, P. (2019). Needs analysis of blended learning media to improve students mathematical creative thinking skills of mathematics student by using the Mentimeter application. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Seminar on Trends in Science and Science Education, 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-10-2018.2287401
  43. Chotimah, I. C., & Cahyani, D. A. (2022). The effect of Mentimeter on students’ Writing achievement in online learning. English Journal of Merdeka: Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 7(1), 128–136. https://doi.org/10.26905/ENJOURME.V7I1.7900
  44. Wood, A. (2020). Utilizing technology-enhanced learning in geography: Testing student response systems in large lectures. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 44(1), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1697653
  45. Tarazi, A., & Ortega-Martín, J. L. (2023). Enhancing EFL students’ engagement in online synchronous classes: The role of the Mentimeter platform. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1127520. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127520
  46. Chamorro-Atalaya, O., Morales-Romero, G., Trinidad-Loli, N., Caycho-Salas, B., Guía-Altamirano, T., Auqui-Ramos, E., ..., & Gonzales-Huaytahuilca, R. (2023). Gamification in engineering education during COVID-19: A systematic review on design considerations and success factors in its implementation. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(6), 301–327. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.17
  47. Hill, L. (2020). Mentimeter: A tool for actively engaging large lecture cohorts. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(2), 256–258. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2019.0129
  48. Mohin, M., Kunzwa, L., & Patel, S. (2022). Using Mentimeter to enhance learning and teaching in a large class. International Journal of Educational Policy Research and Review, 9(2), 48–57.
  49. Burlacu, M., Coman, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2023). Blogged into the system: A systematic review of the gamification in e-learning before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Sustainability, 15(8), 6476. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086476
  50. Baah, C., Govender, I., & Subramaniam, P. R. (2024). Enhancing learning engagement: A study on gamification’s influence on motivation and cognitive load. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101115
  51. Megasari, E., Pengembangan, B., Daya, S., Riau, M. P., & Ronggowarsito, J. (2022). Kepuasan peserta diklat terhadap penggunaan Mentimeter sebagai metode pembelajaran latsar CPNS milenial kabupaten Kampar [Trainee satisfaction with the use of Mentimeter as a learning method for millennial CPNS basic training in Kampar regency]. Jurnal Wacana Kinerja: Kajian Praktis-Akademis Kinerja dan Administrasi Pelayanan Publik, 25(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31845/JWK.V25I1.714
  52. Handoko, W., Mizkat, E., Nasution, A., Hambali, & Eska, J. (2021). Gamification in learning using Quizizz application as assessment tools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1783(1), 012111. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1783/1/012111
  53. Rahmahani, D. (2020). The effect of gamified student response system on students’ perception and achievement. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 10(2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v10i2.11698
  54. Aguiar-Castillo, L., Clavijo-Rodriguez, A., Hernández-López, L., de Saa-Pérez, P., & Pérez-Jiménez, R. (2021). Gamification and deep learning approaches in higher education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 29, 100290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100290
  55. Mirani, R., & Pratama, D. (2021). Comparison of the students’ perception of Mentimeter and Google classroom in teaching listening. Issues in Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching, 3(1), 22–27.
  56. Trees, A. R., & Jackson, M. H. (2007). The learning environment in clicker classrooms: Student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880601141179

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.