INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHANGES IN EDUCATION
Research Article
Aug 12, 2026 128 45

The Professional Development of Gifted Students in Mathematics: A Follow-Up Study of the Winners of Mathematics Competitions

Peijie Jiang 1 * ,
Wenqian Lin 1
1 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hunan Normal University, China* Corresponding Author
International Journal of Changes in Education, 3(3), 2026, 387-395, https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025942
Online publication date: Sep 01, 2025
Publication date: Aug 12, 2026
Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Mathematics competition winners are key subjects in research on mathematically gifted education. This study examined the career trajectories, academic achievements, and personal traits of 116 high school mathematics competition winners (graduating from 2008 to 2015) through the longitudinal questionnaire analysis. The key findings are as follows: (1) career clustering in STEM fields (technology, academia, finance) and advanced degree pursuits (81 participants); (2) high academic productivity, with 43 participants publishing as first authors and 13 holding patents; (3) income polarization (22.4% earning >¥40,000 vs. 12.1% earning <¥5,000 monthly); (4) elevated perfectionism (95.6%) and creativity (96.6%) in self-assessments; and (5) perceived benefits of competition experiences, including enhanced learning skills (87.9%) and academic growth (76.7%). The results highlight the strong correlation between mathematical talent and STEM-oriented careers, exceptional scholarly output, and the enduring impact of personal traits (e.g., perfectionism) and environmental factors on professional success. This work offers empirical insights into cultivating mathematically gifted individuals and assessing the long-term effectiveness of competition-based education.

KEYWORDS

mathematical competition gifted students professional development follow-up research mathematical talent

CITATION (APA)

Jiang, P., & Lin, W. (2026). The Professional Development of Gifted Students in Mathematics: A Follow-Up Study of the Winners of Mathematics Competitions. International Journal of Changes in Education, 3(3), 387-395. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025942
Harvard
Jiang, P., and Lin, W. (2026). The Professional Development of Gifted Students in Mathematics: A Follow-Up Study of the Winners of Mathematics Competitions. International Journal of Changes in Education, 3(3), pp. 387-395. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025942
Vancouver
Jiang P, Lin W. The Professional Development of Gifted Students in Mathematics: A Follow-Up Study of the Winners of Mathematics Competitions. International Journal of Changes in Education. 2026;3(3):387-95. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025942
AMA
Jiang P, Lin W. The Professional Development of Gifted Students in Mathematics: A Follow-Up Study of the Winners of Mathematics Competitions. International Journal of Changes in Education. 2026;3(3), 387-395. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025942
Chicago
Jiang, Peijie, and Wenqian Lin. "The Professional Development of Gifted Students in Mathematics: A Follow-Up Study of the Winners of Mathematics Competitions". International Journal of Changes in Education 2026 3 no. 3 (2026): 387-395. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025942
MLA
Jiang, Peijie et al. "The Professional Development of Gifted Students in Mathematics: A Follow-Up Study of the Winners of Mathematics Competitions". International Journal of Changes in Education, vol. 3, no. 3, 2026, pp. 387-395. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025942

REFERENCES

  1. Al-Ansari, A. M., Al-Hilal, A. J., & Alansari, A. E. (2025). Public school principals’ role in supporting mathematically gifted students by equipping them with 21st-century skills. Quality Assurance in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-01-2025-0001
  2. Chang, C.-C., & Yu, H.-P. (2021). Gāozhōng kēxué bān bìyè shēng zhī zhuīzōng yánjiū: Dàxué xuéxí biǎ oxiàn yǔ shēngyá fāzhǎn zhī tàntǎo [Follow-up study on college learning performance and career development of science class graduates]. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 66(1), 173–202.
  3. Lakin, J. M., & Wai, J. (2020). Spatially gifted, academically inconvenienced: Spatially talented students experience less academic engagement and more behavioural issues than other talented students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 1015–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12343
  4. Olton-Weber, S., Hess, R., & Ritchotte, J. A. (2020). Reducing levels of perfectionism in gifted and talented youth through a mindfulness intervention. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(4), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220953392
  5. Wai, J., Bardach, L., & Tran, B. (2022). What longitudinal research and large-scale population representative studies can tell us about gifted students and education policy 50 years after the Marland Report. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 45(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532211063942
  6. Wai, J., Kell, H. J., & Worrell, F. C. (2024). Method considerations for school psychology from longitudinal research on gifted students. Journal of School Psychology, 103, 101269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101269
  7. Bernstein, B. O., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2021). Academic acceleration in gifted youth and fruitless concerns regarding psychological well-being: A 35-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 830–845. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/edu0000500
  8. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x
  9. Gagné, F. (2021). Implementing the DMGT’s constructs of giftedness and talent: What, why, and how? In S. R. Smith (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness and talent development in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 71–99). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3041-4_3
  10. Erdogan, A., & Yemenli, E. (2019). Gifted students’ attitudes towards mathematics: A qualitative multidimensional analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9562-5
  11. Subotnik, R. F., Pillmeier, E., & Jarvin, L. (2009). The psychosocial dimensions of creativity in mathematics: Implications for gifted education policy. In A. Berman, B. Koichu, & R. Leikin (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 165–179). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087909352_012
  12. Assmus, D., & Fritzlar, T. (2022). Mathematical creativity and mathematical giftedness in the primary school age range: An interview study on creating figural patterns. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 54(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01328-8
  13. Pitta-Pantazi, D., Christou, C., Kontoyianni, K., & Kattou, M. (2011). A model of mathematical giftedness: Integrating natural, creative, and mathematical abilities. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.548900
  14. Kholid, M. N., Mahmudah, M. H., Ishartono, N., Putra, F. G., & Forthmann, B. (2024). Classification of students’ creative thinking for non-routine mathematical problems. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2394738. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2394738
  15. Marsitin, R., Sa’dijah, C., Susiswo, S., & Chandra, T. D. (2022). Creative mathematical reasoning process of climber students in solving higher order thinking skills geometry problems. TEM Journal, 11(4), 1877–1886.
  16. Berkowitz, M., Edelsbrunner, P., & Stern, E. (2022). The relation between working memory and mathematics performance among students in math-intensive STEM programs. Intelligence, 92, 101649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2022.101649
  17. Sugiman, S., Rızkıanto, I., & Pujıasti, E. (2020). Artistically talented students’ perceptions of mathematics: View, interest, competence, and relevance. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3), 1247–1261. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.762677
  18. Savenkov, A. I. (2021). Cognitive and non-cognitive determinants of academic and life success. In The 2nd International Scientific and Practical Online Conference “Psychology of Giftedness and Creativity” 2020, 117, 01001. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111701001
  19. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., & Hess-Green, R. (2020). Valued actions and identities of giftedness in a mathematical camp. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(7), 1311–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10013-4
  20. Abdrakhmanov, R., Zhaxanova, A., Karatayeva, M., Niyazova, G. Z., Berkimbayev, K., & Tuimebayev, A. (2024). Development of a framework for predicting students’ academic performance in STEM education using machine learning methods. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 15(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150105
  21. Kaufman, S. B., & Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Conceptions of giftedness. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 71–91). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74401-8_5
  22. Mhlolo, S. V., & Mhlolo, M. (2024). Support given to the gifted learner: Lessons from selected primary schools in South Africa and Zimbabwe. Advances in Social Sciences and Management, 2(11), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.63002/assm.211.634
  23. Zhang, Z. (2017). Gifted education in China. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1364881. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1364881
  24. Leikin, R. (2021). When practice needs more research: The nature and nurture of mathematical giftedness. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(7), 1579–1589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01276-9
  25. Karp, A. (2010). Teachers of the mathematically gifted tell about themselves and their profession. Roeper Review, 32(4), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2010.485306
  26. Pyryt, M. C. (2009). Recent developments in technology: Implications for gifted education. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 1173–1180). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_60
  27. Ng, W., & Nicholas, H. (2007). Conceptualizing the use of online technologies for gifted secondary students. Roeper Review, 29(3), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190709554408
  28. McCabe, K. O., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2020). Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(2), 390–416. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pspp0000239
  29. Milgram, R. M., & Hong, E. (1993). Creative thinking and creative performance in adolescents as predictors of creative attainments in adults: A follow-up study after 18 years. Roeper Review, 15(3), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199309553487
  30. Hany, E. A. (1994). The development of basic cognitive components of technical creativity: A longitudinal comparison of children and youth with high and average intelligence. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 115–154). Ablex.
  31. Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682
  32. Bentsi-Enchill, F. (2024). Teachers’ role and factors hindering Ghanaian high school students’ academic performance using Walberg’s educational productivity. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2393924. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2393924
  33. Walberg, H. J. (1981). A psychological theory of educational productivity. In F. H. Farley & N. Gordon (Eds.), Psychology and education (pp. 81–110). McCutchan.
  34. Walberg, H. J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America’s schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19–27.
  35. Campbell, J. R. (1994). Developing cross-cultural/cross-national instruments: Using cross-national methods and procedures. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(7), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(94)90040-X
  36. Yuret, T. (2024). Career paths of the International Mathematics Olympiad (IMO) medalists. Scientometrics, 129(6), 3469–3491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05042-y
  37. Neber, H., & Heller, K. A. (2002). Evaluation of a summer-school program for highly gifted secondary-school students: The German Pupils Academy. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 214–228. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2002-06643-005
  38. Liu, J., Banda, L. O. L., Lyu, W., Shuang, M. S., & Chen, C. (2024). Assessing the relation between academic talent mobility and academic output. Heliyon, 10(20), e39437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39437
  39. Ones, D. S., Stanek, K. C., & Dilchert, S. (2025). Beyond change: Personality-environment alignment at work. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 33(1), e12507. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12507
  40. Ervynck, G. (2002). Mathematical creativity. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 42–53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1_3
  41. Pyryt, M. C. (2010). Helping gifted students cope with perfectionism. In J. L. Jolly, D. J. Treffinger, & T. F. Inman (Eds.), Parenting gifted children: The authoritative guide from the National Association for Gifted Children (pp. 546–554). Routledge.
  42. Burkett-McKee, S., Knight, B. A., & Vanderburg, M. A. (2021). Psychological well-being of students with high abilities and their school’s ecology: Is there a relationship? Roeper Review, 43(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2021.1923593
  43. Townend, G., Jolly, J. L., & Chew, A. (2024). Professional development in gifted education: A systematic literature review. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 49(6), 76–104.
  44. Pezzuti, L., Farese, M., Dawe, J., & Lauriola, M. (2025). The role of parental education, intelligence, and personality on the cognitive abilities of gifted children. Journal of Intelligence, 13(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13020012
  45. Lv, S., He, Y., Xiong, B., & Wu, Y. (2024). Stress in Chinese teachers who teach the mathematically gifted: A qualitative perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1388236. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1388236

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.