INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHANGES IN EDUCATION
Research Article
Feb 09, 2026 1 0

Undercover Advocates: Secondary Teachers Empowering English Learners in Mainstream Classrooms

Carla Huck 1 *
1 Curriculum Development and Production, American College of Education, USA* Corresponding Author
International Journal of Changes in Education, 3(1), 2026, 37-48, https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025282
Publication date: Feb 09, 2026
Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study examines the experiences of nine secondary content teachers who report high self-efficacy in working with English learners (ELs) in mainstream classrooms. As the number of ELs in US schools grows, many content area teachers feel unprepared to support these students effectively. Grounded in the theoretical frameworks of culturally responsive pedagogy and teacher self-efficacy, this phenomenological study focuses on mathematics, science, and social studies teachers in Florida public schools. The research employs in-depth, semi-structured interviews to explore teachers’ perceptions and lived experiences. Significant themes that emerged from the analysis include (a) undercover advocacy, (b) ethic of care, and (c) leveraging student achievement data. A common thread woven through all narratives was the integration of students’ native languages through translation and translanguaging practices while leading with empathy. Participants created more equitable learning environments for ELs in mainstream classrooms through multifaceted, often covert, advocacy efforts. Implications for teacher preparation programs and school districts are discussed, including professional development initiatives to cultivate teachers’ asset-based ideologies toward ELs and improve their pedagogical practices. Recommendations for state and national policymakers include modifications to ESOL certification requirements. This research informs efforts to foster mainstream teacher preparedness and efficacy in working with linguistically diverse student populations.

KEYWORDS

advocacy English learners mainstream classrooms secondary teachers self-efficacy

CITATION (APA)

Huck, C. (2026). Undercover Advocates: Secondary Teachers Empowering English Learners in Mainstream Classrooms. International Journal of Changes in Education, 3(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025282
Harvard
Huck, C. (2026). Undercover Advocates: Secondary Teachers Empowering English Learners in Mainstream Classrooms. International Journal of Changes in Education, 3(1), pp. 37-48. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025282
Vancouver
Huck C. Undercover Advocates: Secondary Teachers Empowering English Learners in Mainstream Classrooms. International Journal of Changes in Education. 2026;3(1):37-48. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025282
AMA
Huck C. Undercover Advocates: Secondary Teachers Empowering English Learners in Mainstream Classrooms. International Journal of Changes in Education. 2026;3(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025282
Chicago
Huck, Carla. "Undercover Advocates: Secondary Teachers Empowering English Learners in Mainstream Classrooms". International Journal of Changes in Education 2026 3 no. 1 (2026): 37-48. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025282
MLA
Huck, Carla "Undercover Advocates: Secondary Teachers Empowering English Learners in Mainstream Classrooms". International Journal of Changes in Education, vol. 3, no. 1, 2026, pp. 37-48. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025282

REFERENCES

  1. National Center for Education Statistics. (2024). English learners in public schools. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgf
  2. Okhremtchouk, I. S., & Sellu, G. S. (2019). Teacher readiness to work with English language learners: Arizona context. The Teacher Educator, 54(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2018.1533058
  3. Villegas, A. M., SaizdeLaMora, K., Martin, A. D., & Mills, T. (2018). Preparing future mainstream teachers to teach English language learners: A review of the empirical literature. The Educational Forum, 82(2), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1420850
  4. Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. J. (2023). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model. UK: Pearson.
  5. Kim, H. J., Lee, Y.-J., & de Jong, E. J. (2022). Preparing mainstream teacher candidates to work with English language learners: Dissonance and care developing agency. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1303–1314. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1303
  6. Bunch, G. C., & Martin, D. (2021). From “academic language” to the “language of ideas”: A disciplinary perspective on using language in K-12 settings. Language and Education, 35(6), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1842443
  7. Santibañez, L., & Gándara, P. (2018). Teachers of English language learners in secondary schools: Gaps in preparation and support. The Civil Rights Project. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6c95c6bx
  8. Pettit, S. K. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs about English language learners in the mainstream classroom: A review of the literature. International Multilingual Research Journal, 5(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2011.594357
  9. Reeves, J. R. (2006). Secondary teacher attitudes toward including English-language learners in mainstream classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(3), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.3.131-143
  10. Kim, S., & Park, J. Y. (2024). Critical awareness toward content-language integrated education for multilingual learners (CA-CIEML): A survey study about teachers’ ideological beliefs and attitudes. Language Awareness, 33(2), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2024.2321895
  11. U.S. Department of Education. (2019). Teacher shortage areas. https://tsa.ed.gov/#/reports
  12. Coady, M. R., Lopez, M. P. S., & Li, S. (2019). Language-ineducation planning: The Florida consent decree after 25 years. Florida Journal of Educational Research, 57(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.62798/DCTE9174
  13. Loeb, S., Soland, J., & Fox, L. (2014). Is a good teacher a good teacher for all? Comparing value-added of teachers with their English learners and non-English learners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714527788
  14. Master, B., Loeb, S., Whitney, C., & Wyckoff, J. (2016). Different skills? Identifying differentially effective teachers of English language learners. The Elementary School Journal, 117(2), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1086/688871
  15. Coady, M., Harper, C., & de Jong, E. (2011). From preservice to practice: Mainstream elementary teacher beliefs of preparation and efficacy with English language learners in the state of Florida. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2011.597823
  16. Lyon, E. G., Scott, L., Casesa, R., Spurgin, C., & Maldonado, S. I. (2025). Transforming secondary teacher preparation for multilingual learners through translanguaging: Toward an integrated biliteracy and disciplinary learning framework. TESOL Journal, 16(1), e903. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.903
  17. Tai, K. W. H. (2022). Translanguaging as inclusive pedagogical practices in English-medium instruction science and mathematics classrooms for linguistically and culturally diverse students. Research in Science Education, 52(3), 975–1012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10018-6
  18. Fischer, N., & Lahmann, C. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism in school: An evaluation of a course concept for introducing linguistically responsive teaching. Language Awareness, 29(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1737706
  19. Gallagher, M. A., & Scrivner, S. (2024). Teachers’ beliefs about language diversity and multilingual learners: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 95(4), 822–861. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241257533
  20. Torff, B., & Murphy, A. F. (2020). Teachers’ beliefs about English learners: Adding linguistic support to enhance academic rigor. Phi Delta Kappan, 101(5), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720903822
  21. Bacon, C. K. (2020). “It’s not really my job”: A mixed methods framework for language ideologies, monolingualism, and teaching emergent bilingual learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(2), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118783188
  22. Christison, M. (2023). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs, practices, emerging ideologies about multilingualism and self-efficacy relative to teaching multilingual learners. Languages, 8(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010041
  23. Lucas, T., & Villegas, A. M. (2013). Preparing linguistically responsive teachers: Laying the foundation in preservice teacher education. Theory into Practice, 52(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2013.770327
  24. Wolf, M. K., Bailey, A. L., Ballard, L., Wang, Y., & Pogossian, A. (2023). Unpacking the language demands in academic content and English language proficiency standards for English learners. International Multilingual Research Journal, 17(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2022.2116221
  25. Erath, K., Ingram, J., Moschkovich, J., & Prediger, S. (2021). Designing and enacting instruction that enhances language for mathematics learning: A review of the state of development and research. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01213-2
  26. Pappamihiel, N. E., & Lynn, C. A. (2016). Adaptations for english language learners: Differentiating between linguistic and instructional accommodations. TESL-EJ, 20(3), 1–13.
  27. Stairs-Davenport, A. (2023). “Where do I start?” Inquiry into K-12 mainstream teachers’ knowledge about differentiating instruction for ELLs in one U.S. school district. Education Inquiry, 14(2), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1969078
  28. Lorenz, E., Krulatz, A., & Torgersen, E. N. (2021). Embracing linguistic and cultural diversity in multilingual EAL classrooms: The impact of professional development on teacher beliefs and practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103428
  29. Fu, Y., & Wang, J. (2021). Assessing mainstream pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy to teach English language learners. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1439a
  30. Huck, C. (2025). Preparation of secondary mainstream teachers to ensure equitable outcomes for English learners. Research in Education, 121(3), 322–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237241248533
  31. Johnson, A. (2023). Achievement and growth for English learners. Educational Policy, 37(4), 1044–1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048211049419
  32. Short, D. J. (2017). How to integrate content and language learning effectively for English language learners. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7b), 4237–4260. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00806a
  33. Maddamsetti, J. (2022). Analyzing elementary teachers’ advocacy for emergent bilinguals as identity dissonances from cognitive, emotional, and social perspectives. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 21(4), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1791710
  34. Norman, L. N. M., & Eslami, Z. R. (2022). English learner teacher advocates: A systematic literature review. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 25(4), 1–28.
  35. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
  36. Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053002003
  37. Tigert, J. M., Peercy, M. M., Fredricks, D., & Kidwell, T. (2022). Humanizing classroom management as a core practice for teachers of multilingual students. TESOL Quarterly, 56(4), 1087–1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3093
  38. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  39. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. USA: W. H. Freeman.
  40. Cho, S., Lee, H.-J., & Herner-Patnode, L. (2020). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy in addressing cultural and linguistic needs of diverse learners. The Teacher Educator, 55(4), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2020.1805835
  41. Clark, S. K., & Andreasen, L. (2021). Exploring elementary teacher self-efficacy and teacher beliefs: Are we preparing teachers to teach culturally diverse students? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 49(1), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2020.1777528
  42. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
  43. Creswell, J. C., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. USA: SAGE Publications.
  44. van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315421056
  45. Morgan, D. A. (2021). Analysing complexity: Developing a modified phenomenological hermeneutical method of data analysis for multiple contexts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1847996
  46. Labaree, R. V. (2002). The risk of ‘going observationalist’: Negotiating the hidden dilemmas of being an insider participant observer. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001641
  47. Harper, J., & Kezar, A. (2021). Leadership for liberation: A leadership framework and guide for student affairs professionals. USA: USC Pullias Center for Higher Education.
  48. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 71–81). Academic Press.
  49. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
  50. Vera, E. M., Heineke, A., Israel, M., Hill, M., Goldberger, N., Hook, K., & Anderson, B. (2022). Learning about English learners: Teachers’ and leaders’ perceptions of effective professional development. International Multilingual Research Journal, 16(2), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2021.1971474
  51. Mendoza, A., Hamman-Ortiz, L., Tian, Z., Rajendram, S., Tai, K. W., Ho, W. Y. J., & Sah, P. K. (2024). Sustaining critical approaches to translanguaging in education: A contextual framework. TESOL Quarterly, 58(2), 664–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3240
  52. Bertrand, M., & Marsh, J. (2021). How data-driven reform can drive deficit thinking. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(8), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217211013936
  53. Piazza, S. V., Williams, C. T., Protacio, M. S., David, V., Tigchelaar, M., & Kuo, H.-C. (2020). Improving instruction for English learners: A professional development study using SIOP. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 9(3), 383–405.
  54. Ángeles, S. L. (2025). “I wasn’t trained for ELD”: The experiences of bilingual content-area teachers. Bilingual Research Journal, 48(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2024.2385407
  55. Guler, N. (2020). Preparing to teach English language learners: Effect of online courses in changing mainstream teachers’ perceptions of English language learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1494736

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.